Recent Comments
  • By somee in Silly Omegle Chat: hahaha, these maths people. read in context
  • By anonymous in Math Sex Jokes: I always heard it... B4i4Q RU/18 QT pi read in context
  • By izmir malaj in Google suggest fail: im gay read in context
  • By Andrew Stella in Top 10 list of geeky math comics / webcomics: Hey, hilarious site. I have a webcomic that isn't totally math but we do have math jokes on occasion, like this one: http://www.peebleslab.com/77 and some others you might like. Keep up the good work! read in context
  • By Steve in Lord of the Rings Math: Equation should look more like y=-1/(x-gandalf) :P read in context
  • By Curtis in d (Optimus) / dx: Haha, Optimus prime. That's a good one. read in context
  • By David in A Friendly Chat About Whether 0.999... = 1: 1/3=0.(3) 3*1/3=3/3=1 3*0.(3)=0.(9) 0.(9)=1 read in context
  • By mathfail in Heart Graphs: Lots of different kinds of software can do that :P Including Wolfram Alpha (which uses Mathematica). read in context
  • By Nahuel in Heart Graphs: Those are great... you know what software they used to make the graphs? I've trying to find a software to plot conics and quadrics for AGES but failed miserably. read in context
  • By Robert Schwarz in Almost pizza hut! Almost....: Also, how is $22.05 + $0.00 = $23.80? read in context
  • By Axel in Silly prediction quiz: The only possible result is 9. This is easy to prove. If you write a function of x where x is the number you choose between 1 and 9 and simplify it, it will look like this: choose a number x multiply by 3 3x add 3 3x + 3 multiply by 3 again 3(3x + 3) simplify f(x) = 9(x + 1) Obviously (x + 1) is a random number beetween 2 and 10 and we know that if we multiply a number on that space by 9 the first number will be an rising row and the second one a descending row. 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 90 So if we call the first number a, the second number b and x +1 will be k then it will look like this: a = k-1 = x+1-1 = x b = 10-k = 10-(x+1) = 9-x then the final step is y = a+b = x+9-x = x y = 9 read in context
  • By Nemo in Facebook sucks at math: Thus causing their numbers to substract instead of adding? lol read in context
  • By Nemo in World of Warcraft - Negative gold problem: Copper must be highly devaluated, uh? read in context
  • By Nemo in First Annual Special Mathlympics to be hosted by Canada in 2012: It has nothing, lulz That is SO evil and nothing to do with maths. read in context
  • By Nemo in Fox news fail (again): I would ask another poll: Do you believe Fox News falsified or altogether invented the results of it's already biased poll? (note that there isn't even is a "no" option, or something as simple as "unlikely") read in context
  • By Mathguy in Lord of the Rings Math: VERTICAL ASYMPTOTES FTW!!!!!! read in context
  • By mizzara in Penis physics: it says DICKtation, its from "summer heights high". very funny tv show. haha read in context
  • By Nikk in Lord of the Rings Math: Would've been better if the range was in set builder notation. read in context
  • By NDUNGO ISSA in Girls are dumb at math: good results read in context
  • By Chris Sakalis in Plato Quote: That is correct. The nano-bots are currently kept at the Louvre Museum, but of course you can't see them, since they are so small. read in context
  • By Wintermute in Plato Quote: @Chris Sakalis Yes there were. Plato was even a skilled neuro-surgeon and the first person to create working nano-bots ^_^ read in context
  • By pepepepepeppe in Pokemath: the letter of the student and the theacher are the same ¬¬ read in context
  • By Stig Johan in Test proof fail: Proof by running out of time. read in context
  • By Arthur Rainbow in The 5 Pirates Puzzle: Let's call them 1 2 3 4 and 5, 1 the youngest and 5 the oldest. Let suppose that, if they have the same amount of money when the oldest is killed or not, they decide to kill him. If there is one person, he take all. If there are two, 2 give all to 1, else 1 would refuse, 2 would die and 1 have all. If there are three people: if 3 is killed 1 will have everything (look for the case of two people) so 1 will want 3 killed. To avoid beeing killed he must then buy 2, and since 2 is greedy, and even 1 coin is better than anything he could have if 3 is killed, giving one coin to 2 and taking everything else is ok for 3 to survive. If there are four people: 4 need to buy 2 people and he can't buy 3 who will take almost everything if 4 is killed. But it can buy 2 and 1 by giving them two and one coins, wich is better than what they would have if 4 is killed. If there are five pirates: 5 need to buy 3 pirates, he can't buy 4, for the same reason than 4 can't buy 3, so he need to buy 3, 2 and 1 wich can be done giving them one, three and two coins. Pirate 5 then can have 94 coins ! read in context
  • By Arthur Rainbow in Test proof fail: I beg your pardon, but it's kind of hard to read on the picture. "Proof by [???]", could you complete please? read in context
  • By Chris Sakalis in Plato Quote: Where there biochemists, physical chemists and biologists at Plato's era? read in context
  • By Wintermute in Math Tudoring: Sooo...... does this means you ain't tudoring? ;) read in context
  • By mathfail in Amazing Math Tattoos!: Yup, this site gets about 10 spam messages a day. Whenever I increase the spam threshold, all the legitimate messages get marked as spam and the spam messages still make it through :-S I think I'm going to have to look into some other options soon :-\ read in context
  • By Arthur Rainbow in Amazing Math Tattoos!: Something told me "Biliga webbhotell" is a spammer :p Seriously, is there really people crazy enough to get this kind of tatoos ? Are this non-permanent tattoos or photoshoping ? read in context